Acta Forestalia Fennica

228 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 228 papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (58 papers), Plant Science (56 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (53 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (46 papers), Forest ecology and management (46 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Forestalia Fennica are Heikki Hänninen, Olavi Laiho, Tauno Kallio, Juhani Päivänen, Peitsa Mikola, Juha Nurmi, Leena Finér, Eero Nikinmaa, Pauline Oker‐Blom and Lauri Valsta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Forestalia Fennica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Forestalia Fennica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Forestalia Fennica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Forestalia Fennica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025