Australian Journal of Psychology

32.1k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Australian Journal of Psychology

1.7k papers receiving 27.4k citations

Peers

Australian Journal of Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Social Psychology 9.5k
  • Applied Psychology 1.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 7.8k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.4k
Replace Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement with:
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement Canada
Human Development United States
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology United States
The Journal of General Psychology United States
European Journal of Psychological Assessment Germany
Europe’s Journal of Psychology United States
Psicothema Spain
The Journal of Genetic Psychology United States
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne Canada
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development United States
Australian Journal of Psychology relative to Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement Canada Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Australian Journal of Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Journal of Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Journal of Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology.

About Australian Journal of Psychology

The 2.0k papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 32.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Australian Journal of Psychology usually cover General Psychology (47 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (383 papers), Applied Psychology (134 papers), Social Psychology (532 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (397 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (160 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (149 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (91 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (85 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (83 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (77 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (70 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Journal of Psychology are N. T. Feather, Deborah J. Terry, Gökmen Arslan, Ross Flett, Richard Kammann, Emery Schubert, Gordon E. O’Brien, Anita S. Mak, Chris Pratt and Andrew J. Martin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact