Australian Accounting Review

882 papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 882 papers published in Australian Accounting Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Accounting Review usually cover Accounting (569 papers), Strategy and Management (364 papers) and Management Information Systems (217 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (444 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (265 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (212 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Accounting Review are Allan Barton, Roger Simnett, Roger Burritt, Craig Deegan, Garry D. Carnegie, Stefan Schaltegger, Christopher Nobes, Tyrone M. Carlin, Lee D. Parker and Jenny Stewart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Accounting Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Accounting Review.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Accounting Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Accounting Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Accounting Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025