Australasian Plant Disease Notes

740 papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 740 papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes usually cover Plant Science (692 papers), Cell Biology (420 papers) and Molecular Biology (154 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (420 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (196 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australasian Plant Disease Notes are Roger G. Shivas, Olinto Liparini Pereira, S. K. Raj, Jane D. Ray, H. Golzar, Treena I. Burgess, R.A. Fullerton, Robert K. Taylor, Susheel Kumar and M.A. Manning.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes.

Countries where authors publish in Australasian Plant Disease Notes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australasian Plant Disease Notes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025