Audiological Medicine

267 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 267 papers published in Audiological Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Audiological Medicine usually cover Sensory Systems (167 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (128 papers) and Neurology (96 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (165 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (123 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Audiological Medicine are Dafydd Stephens, Linnett Sanchez, David R. Moore, Laurence McKenna, Gerhard Andersson, Sally Hind, Rose Marie Rine, Heather Fortnum, Jean S. Moog and Ann E. Geers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Audiological Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Audiological Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Audiological Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Audiological Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Audiological Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Audiological Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Audiological Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025