Atomic Spectroscopy

670 papers and 4.9k indexed citations

About

The 670 papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy usually cover Analytical Chemistry (388 papers), Electrochemistry (107 papers) and Spectroscopy (73 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical chemistry methods development (362 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (107 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Atomic Spectroscopy are Mustafa Soylak, Thomas W. May, Bayram Yüksel, Arijit Sengupta, Shizhong Chen, Zhaochu Hu, Zhang Wen, V. Balaram, Kim A. Anderson and Muharrem İnce.

In The Last Decade

Atomic Spectroscopy

604 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy.

Countries where authors publish in Atomic Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Atomic Spectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Atomic Spectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atomic Spectroscopy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026