Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

816 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 816 papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (521 papers), Epidemiology (181 papers) and Surgery (140 papers) specifically the topics of Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (127 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (110 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine are Oriol Roca, Joan Ramón Masclans, Alan M. Fein, John Edelsberg, Gregory Tino, Gerry Oster, Derek Weycker, Mary E. Strek, Leah J. Witt and James J. Curran.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Pulmonary Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Pulmonary Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025