Indian Economic Review

452 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 452 papers published in Indian Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Indian Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (264 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (174 papers) and Finance (93 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (82 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (65 papers) and Global trade and economics (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Indian Economic Review are Benjamin S. Cheng, Subhash C. Ray, Debraj Ray, Pami Dua, Devesh Roy, Arvind Virmani, Aviral Kumar Tiwari, Akhand Akhtar Hossain, J.V. Meenakshi and Kaliappa Kalirajan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Indian Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Indian Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Indian Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in Indian Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Indian Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Indian Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indian Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025