Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
527 papers
receiving
15.9k citations
Peers
Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
Biological Psychiatry1.3k
Psychiatry and Mental health5.7k
Neurology3.0k
Physiology7.5k
Pharmacology2.7k
Replace NeuroMolecular Medicine with:
NeuroMolecular MedicineUnited States
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s DiseaseUnited States
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeurologyUnited States
Aging and DiseaseChina
Neurodegenerative DiseasesUnited States
Advances in pharmacologyUnited States
The Pharmacogenomics JournalUnited States
Molecular Aspects of MedicineUnited States
Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease MonitoringUnited States
NeuroImmunoModulationUnited States
Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventionsrelative toNeuroMolecular MedicineUnited StatesNeuroMolecular Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
NeuroMolecular Medicine · 1×
×0.71k/2kBP
×2.66k/2kPMH
×0.63k/5kNEURO
×0.97k/8kPHYSI
×1.13k/2kPHARM
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
This network shows the impact of papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions.
About Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
The 924 papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions in the last decades have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (257 papers), Physiology (116 papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 papers), Neurology (32 papers) and Biological Psychiatry (8 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (252 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (98 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (15 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (14 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions are Jeffrey L. Cummings, Kate Zhong, Garam Lee, Aaron R. Ritter, Bruce T. Lamb, Jefferson W. Kinney, Arnold Salazar, Shane M. Bemiller, Andrew S. Murtishaw and Jorge Ramón Fonseca Cacho.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.