Asian Business & Management

606 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 606 papers published in Asian Business & Management in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Business & Management usually cover Strategy and Management (304 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (162 papers) and Accounting (150 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (163 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (139 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Business & Management are Peter Yang, Bill Taylor, Yipeng Liu, Fabian Jintae Froese, Fred Robins, Toru Yoshikawa, Celia Lee, Jong Min Lee, Jie Wu and Phillip Phan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Business & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Business & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Business & Management.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Business & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Business & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Business & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Business & Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025