ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE

332 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 332 papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (87 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (63 papers) and Neurology (39 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and Wakefulness Research (45 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (25 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE are O. Pompeiano, Gillian Weiss, Rosamond M. Eccles, G. Moruzzi, Giacomo Rossi, Alberto Zanchetti, C. Batini, A. Lundberg, B. Holmqvist and O. Oscarsson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE.

Countries where authors publish in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025