This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ArchéoSciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ArchéoSciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ArchéoSciences more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in ArchéoSciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ArchéoSciences.
About ArchéoSciences
The 387 papers published in ArchéoSciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in ArchéoSciences usually cover Archeology (37 papers), Space and Planetary Science (39 papers), Archeology (162 papers), Paleontology (89 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (46 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (89 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (86 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (60 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (44 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (39 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (36 papers), Building materials and conservation (36 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ArchéoSciences are Anne Gebhardt, Maria Guerra, Thilo Rehren, Ina Reiche, Matthieu Le Bailly, Françoise Bouchet, Katharina Müller, Yolanda Carrión Marco, Michel Dubar and Sabine Klein.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.