Archaeological Research in Asia

349 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 349 papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia usually cover Paleontology (264 papers), Anthropology (189 papers) and Archeology (153 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (261 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (138 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaeological Research in Asia are Bérénice Bellina, Andrzej Weber, Alison Carter, Hongliang Lü, David B. Madsen, Steven L. Kuhn, Laure Dussubieux, Ashleigh Haruda, Marilee Wood and Rowan K. Flad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia.

Countries where authors publish in Archaeological Research in Asia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaeological Research in Asia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaeological Research in Asia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeological Research in Asia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025