Countries where authors publish in Australasian Plant Pathology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australasian Plant Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australasian Plant Pathology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology.
About Australasian Plant Pathology
The 2.8k papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 36.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology usually cover Horticulture (116 papers), Cell Biology (1.3k papers), Plant Science (2.5k papers), Endocrinology (168 papers) and Insect Science (180 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.3k papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (553 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (465 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (395 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (367 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (359 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (327 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (235 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australasian Plant Pathology are Michael J. Wingfield, G.E.St.J. Hardy, G. M. Murray, P.W. Crous, P.A. O’Brien, B. L. Shearer, G. R. Stirling, Angus J. Carnegie, F. Halleen and John P. Brennan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.