Australasian Plant Pathology

2.7k papers and 33.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 33.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology usually cover Plant Science (2.4k papers), Cell Biology (1.3k papers) and Molecular Biology (506 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.3k papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (545 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (458 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australasian Plant Pathology are Michael J. Wingfield, G.E.St.J. Hardy, G. M. Murray, P.W. Crous, B. L. Shearer, P.A. O’Brien, G. R. Stirling, Angus J. Carnegie, F. Halleen and John P. Brennan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Australasian Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australasian Plant Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australasian Plant Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australasian Plant Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025