This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Angiogenesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Angiogenesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angiogenesis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Angiogenesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Angiogenesis.
About Angiogenesis
The 1.3k papers published in Angiogenesis in the last decades have received a total of 59.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Angiogenesis usually cover Molecular Biology (838 papers), Genetics (63 papers), Immunology and Allergy (32 papers), Ophthalmology (42 papers) and Oncology (94 papers) specifically the topics of Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (756 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (47 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (42 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (32 papers), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (30 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (28 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (25 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Angiogenesis are Arjan W. Griffioen, Bruno Larrivée, Claire Viallard, Marcus Fruttiger, Andrew R. Reynolds, Doménico Ribatti, Naveen S. Vasudev, Lois E. H. Smith, David R. Brigstock and Jing Chen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.