Archiv der Mathematik

7.6k papers and 50.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.6k papers published in Archiv der Mathematik in the last decades have received a total of 50.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Archiv der Mathematik usually cover Geometry and Topology (2.8k papers), Mathematical Physics (2.1k papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Finite Group Theory Research (1.3k papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (1.0k papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (671 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archiv der Mathematik are Ch. G. Philos, Rainer Wittmann, W. Mader, Bang‐Yen Chen, Tudor Zamfirescu, Biagio Ricceri, Martin Kneser, Otto H. Kegel, Anders Kock and L. Carlitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archiv der Mathematik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archiv der Mathematik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archiv der Mathematik.

Countries where authors publish in Archiv der Mathematik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archiv der Mathematik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archiv der Mathematik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archiv der Mathematik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025