Countries where authors publish in Architectural Design
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Architectural Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Architectural Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Architectural Design more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Architectural Design
This network shows the impact of papers published in Architectural Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Architectural Design.
About Architectural Design
The 1.4k papers published in Architectural Design in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Architectural Design usually cover Architecture (361 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (96 papers), Urban Studies (56 papers), Building and Construction (110 papers) and Archeology (62 papers) specifically the topics of Architecture and Computational Design (330 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (67 papers), Design Education and Practice (41 papers), Architecture, Modernity, and Design (41 papers), Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (39 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (39 papers), Architecture and Cultural Influences (38 papers) and Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Architectural Design are Skylar Tibbits, Achim Menges, Patrik Schumacher, Neil Leach, Clemens Preisinger, Daniel Piker, Michael P. Weinstock, Neil Brenner, Michael Ulrich Hensel and Neri Oxman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.