Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum

444 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 444 papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum usually cover Applied Mathematics (246 papers), Mathematical Physics (198 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (158 papers) specifically the topics of Holomorphic and Operator Theory (149 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (81 papers) and Advanced Banach Space Theory (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum are Gábor Czédli, Antonio M. Peralta, George Grätzer, Bilel Selmi, Aristomenis G. Siskakis, Anders Olofsson, Fernanda Botelho, M. ‎Mursaleen, Zoltán Sebestyén and Damir Bakić.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025