Acta periodica technologica

448 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 448 papers published in Acta periodica technologica in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta periodica technologica usually cover Food Science (153 papers), Plant Science (100 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (61 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (54 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (36 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta periodica technologica are Siniša Markov, Dragoljub Cvetković, Jelena Vulić, Mirjana B. Pešić, Sladjana P. Stanojević, Miroljub Barać, Gordana Ćetković, Marina Šćiban, Sanja Podunavac-Kuzmаnоvić and Sonja Djilas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta periodica technologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta periodica technologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta periodica technologica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta periodica technologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta periodica technologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta periodica technologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta periodica technologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025