Acta Botanica Neerlandica

1.8k papers and 27.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica in the last decades have received a total of 27.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica usually cover Plant Science (1.2k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (706 papers) and Molecular Biology (497 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (420 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (310 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (207 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Botanica Neerlandica are T.A. Wijmstra, Sonia E. Sultan, W. H. O. Ernst, C. E. B. Bremekamp, M.T.M. Willemse, A. D. J. Meeuse, P. Kooiman, W.J. Corré, F. D. Boesewinkel and Gerard Meijer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Botanica Neerlandica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Botanica Neerlandica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Botanica Neerlandica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025