Anthropology in Action

307 papers and 1.5k indexed citations

About

The 307 papers published in Anthropology in Action in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropology in Action usually cover Sociology and Political Science (121 papers), Anthropology (45 papers) and General Health Professions (37 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (24 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (23 papers) and Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropology in Action are Dominic Boyer, Abel Polese, Sarmiento Barletti, Kathleen Rice, Vered Amit, Paul Sillitoe, Genevieve Bell, Rikke Sand Andersen, Raymond Massé and Umberto Pellecchia.

In The Last Decade

Anthropology in Action

223 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Anthropology in Action

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropology in Action. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropology in Action.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropology in Action

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropology in Action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropology in Action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropology in Action more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026