WuFeng University

792 papers receiving 15.9k citations

Peers

WuFeng University
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Information Systems and Management 1.6k
  • Communication 985
  • Modeling and Simulation 441
  • Marketing 833
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 1.8k
Replace Hsiuping University of Science and Technology with:
Hsiuping University of Science and Technology Taiwan
National Quemoy University Taiwan
De Lin Institute of Technology Taiwan
Nanhua University Taiwan
Chung Chou University of Science and Technology Taiwan
Hwa Hsia University of Technology Taiwan
Nan Kai University of Technology Taiwan
Ta Hwa University of Science and Technology Taiwan
Shih Hsin University Taiwan
Ling Tung University Taiwan
WuFeng University relative to Hsiuping University of Science and Technology Taiwan Hsiuping University of Science and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
Hsiuping University of Science and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at WuFeng University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at WuFeng University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at WuFeng University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WuFeng University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at WuFeng University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with WuFeng University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with WuFeng University at the time of their publication.

About WuFeng University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with WuFeng University have published 851 papers, which have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 36 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 229 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 88 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 41 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (38 papers), ZnO doping and properties (37 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (26 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (26 papers), Concrete and Cement Materials Research (25 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (24 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (23 papers) and Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (1.6k citations), Communication (985 citations), Modeling and Simulation (441 citations), Marketing (833 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (1.8k citations). Authors at WuFeng University collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Ceramics International, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Alloys and Compounds. Some of WuFeng University's most productive authors include Maochieh Chi, Chung‐Fu Chang, Yen‐Pei Fu, Chun‐Ming Chang, Meng‐Hsiang Hsu, Chiahui Yen, Ran Huang, Teresa Ju, Chun‐Hui Hsiao and Rong-Song He.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact