VA Boston Healthcare System

525.6k citations
12.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

VA Boston Healthcare System

9.8k papers receiving 412.8k citations

Peers

VA Boston Healthcare System
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Clinical Psychology 66.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 42.5k
  • Internal Medicine 7.0k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 7.0k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 12.7k
Replace Rhode Island Hospital with:
Rhode Island Hospital United States
Boston Medical Center United States
Montefiore Medical Center United States
NYU Langone Health United States
McGill University Health Centre Canada
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia United States
Mount Sinai Hospital United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital United States
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School United States
VA Connecticut Healthcare System United States
VA Boston Healthcare System relative to Rhode Island Hospital United States Rhode Island Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Rhode Island Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at VA Boston Healthcare System

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at VA Boston Healthcare System. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at VA Boston Healthcare System with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites VA Boston Healthcare System more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at VA Boston Healthcare System

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with VA Boston Healthcare System at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with VA Boston Healthcare System at the time of their publication.

About VA Boston Healthcare System

In recent decades, authors affiliated with VA Boston Healthcare System have published 12.2k papers, which have received a total of 525.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.8k papers in Clinical Psychology, 168 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 665 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 906 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 900 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine on the topics of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1.0k papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (449 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (297 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (290 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (238 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (233 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (212 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (187 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (66.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (42.5k citations), Internal Medicine (7.0k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (7.0k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (12.7k citations). Authors at VA Boston Healthcare System collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Traumatic Stress, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Blood, Metabolism and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Some of VA Boston Healthcare System's most productive authors include Christos Socrates Mantzoros, Deepak L. Bhatt, J. Michael Gaziano, Robert W. McCarley, Brett T. Litz, Shukri F. Khuri, Ashish K. Jha, Daniel J. Gottlieb, Martha Elizabeth Shenton and Mark W. Miller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact