College of Business Administration

300.0k citations
6.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

College of Business Administration

5.3k papers receiving 285.4k citations

Peers

College of Business Administration
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 76.4k
  • Marketing 65.5k
  • Strategy and Management 70.6k
  • Information Systems and Management 31.3k
  • Management Information Systems 36.1k
Replace Hanken School of Economics with:
Hanken School of Economics Finland
Stockholm School of Economics Sweden
University of Vaasa Finland
Copenhagen Business School Denmark
Vienna University of Economics and Business Austria
Jönköping University Sweden
BI Norwegian Business School Norway
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Lithuania
Turku University of Applied Sciences Finland
Linnaeus University Sweden
College of Business Administration relative to Hanken School of Economics Finland Hanken School of Economics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Hanken School of Economics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at College of Business Administration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at College of Business Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at College of Business Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College of Business Administration more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at College of Business Administration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with College of Business Administration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with College of Business Administration at the time of their publication.

About College of Business Administration

In recent decades, authors affiliated with College of Business Administration have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 300.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Accounting, 934 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 770 papers in Marketing, 759 papers in Finance and 1.0k papers in Strategy and Management on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (627 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (430 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (393 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (367 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (337 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (309 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (284 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (284 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (76.4k citations), Marketing (65.5k citations), Strategy and Management (70.6k citations), Information Systems and Management (31.3k citations) and Management Information Systems (36.1k citations). Authors at College of Business Administration collaborate with scholars in Latvia, United States and Saudi Arabia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing and Journal of Business Ethics. Some of College of Business Administration's most productive authors include Ajay K. Kohli, Bernard J. Jaworski, Arthur Getis, George E. P. Box, Greta M. Ljung, Shelby D. Hunt, William H. Mobley, Robert M. Morgan, Alan R. Hevner and Richard L. Daft.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact