Victoria and Albert Museum

6.1k citations
499 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Conservation Techniques and Studies 94
    • Fashion and Cultural Textiles 46
    • Museums and Cultural Heritage 43
    • Historical Art and Culture Studies 21
    • Crafts, Textile, and Design 21

Victoria and Albert Museum

378 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Victoria and Albert Museum
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Conservation 1.0k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 921
  • Archeology 1.3k
  • Museology 357
  • Space and Planetary Science 86
Replace Museum of the History of Science with:
Museum of the History of Science United Kingdom
National Trust United Kingdom
National Archives United Kingdom
Museum of London United Kingdom
Pearson (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Northampton College United Kingdom
Cultural Heritage Agency of Netherlands Netherlands
Newham College United Kingdom
Laboratoire d’Archéologie Moléculaire et Structurale France
Artesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen Belgium
Victoria and Albert Museum relative to Museum of the History of Science United Kingdom Museum of the History of Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Museum of the History of Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Victoria and Albert Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Victoria and Albert Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Victoria and Albert Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria and Albert Museum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Victoria and Albert Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum at the time of their publication.

About Victoria and Albert Museum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum have published 499 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 118 papers in Conservation, 107 papers in Museology, 135 papers in Archeology, 15 papers in Space and Planetary Science and 50 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts on the topics of Conservation Techniques and Studies (94 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (93 papers), Building materials and conservation (51 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (46 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (43 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (28 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (21 papers) and Crafts, Textile, and Design (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Conservation (1.0k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (921 citations), Archeology (1.3k citations), Museology (357 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (86 citations). Authors at Victoria and Albert Museum collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Studies in Conservation, Journal of Design History, Renaissance Studies, Heritage Science and The Medical Journal of Australia. Some of Victoria and Albert Museum's most productive authors include Claire Smith, Lucía Burgio, Michael Freeman, V. Pinskerová, Robin J. H. Clark, John Styles, Guy Julier, Lars Bertram, Kristina Mullin and David H. Salat.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact