Victoria and Albert Museum

5.0k citations
482 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Conservation Techniques and Studies 97
    • Fashion and Cultural Textiles 50
    • Museums and Cultural Heritage 44
    • Crafts, Textile, and Design 25
    • Historical Art and Culture Studies 23

Victoria and Albert Museum

369 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Victoria and Albert Museum
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Conservation 1.0k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 961
  • Archeology 1.4k
  • Museology 428
  • Space and Planetary Science 90
Replace Museum of London with:
Museum of London United Kingdom
Cultural Heritage Agency of Netherlands Netherlands
Northampton College United Kingdom
Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage Belgium
Laboratoire de Recherche des Monuments Historiques France
Instituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio Spain
Centre de Recherche sur la Conservation France
Musée d'Art et d'Histoire Switzerland
Laboratoire d’Archéologie Moléculaire et Structurale France
Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research Norway
Victoria and Albert Museum relative to Museum of London United Kingdom Museum of London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Museum of London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Victoria and Albert Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Victoria and Albert Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Victoria and Albert Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria and Albert Museum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Victoria and Albert Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum at the time of their publication.

About Victoria and Albert Museum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Victoria and Albert Museum have published 482 papers, which have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 120 papers in Conservation, 117 papers in Museology, 139 papers in Archeology, 51 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts and 13 papers in Space and Planetary Science on the topics of Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (97 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (97 papers), Building materials and conservation (54 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (50 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (44 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (28 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (25 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Conservation (1.0k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (961 citations), Archeology (1.4k citations), Museology (428 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (90 citations). Authors at Victoria and Albert Museum collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Studies in Conservation, Journal of Design History, Journal of the Institute of Conservation, Renaissance Studies and The Medical Journal of Australia. Some of Victoria and Albert Museum's most productive authors include Claire Smith, Lucía Burgio, Robin J. H. Clark, John Styles, Susan Pennell, Guy Julier, N. S. Brommelle, Tim Padfield⊚, Marc Yor and Robert James Elliott.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact