University of Toronto Scarborough

140.2k citations
4.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Toronto Scarborough

4.1k papers receiving 131.6k citations

Peers

University of Toronto Scarborough
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 12.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 11.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 3.7k
  • Ecology 16.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 12.4k
Replace Scarborough Health Network with:
Scarborough Health Network Canada
Wilfrid Laurier University Canada
Trent University Canada
Laurentian University Canada
University of Windsor Canada
Ithaca College United States
Villanova University United States
Brock University Canada
Queens College, CUNY United States
Hunter College United States
University of Toronto Scarborough relative to Scarborough Health Network Canada Scarborough Health Network's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scarborough Health Network · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Toronto Scarborough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Toronto Scarborough. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Toronto Scarborough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Toronto Scarborough more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Toronto Scarborough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Toronto Scarborough at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Toronto Scarborough at the time of their publication.

About University of Toronto Scarborough

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Toronto Scarborough have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 140.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 413 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 416 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 113 papers in Ecological Modeling, 595 papers in Ecology and 46 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (213 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (182 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (164 papers), Plant and animal studies (164 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (141 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (129 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (113 papers) and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (102 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (12.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (11.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (3.7k citations), Ecology (16.8k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (12.4k citations). Authors at University of Toronto Scarborough collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE, Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, The Science of The Total Environment and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Toronto Scarborough's most productive authors include Colin M. MacLeod, Hervé Abdi, Lynne J. Williams, Marc W. Cadotte, Rudy Boonstra, Frank Wania, Greg C. Vanlerberghe, Michael Inzlicht, Heinz‐Bernhard Kraatz and Konstantine K. Zakzanis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact