Deakin University

1.9M citations
65.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Deakin University

55.6k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

Deakin University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Biological Psychiatry 17.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 101.5k
  • Applied Psychology 22.7k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121.7k
  • Biomaterials 56.7k
Replace Monash University with:
Monash University Australia
La Trobe University Australia
The University of Adelaide Australia
RMIT University Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
Swinburne University of Technology Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
Macquarie University Australia
University of Newcastle Australia Australia
University of South Australia Australia
Deakin University relative to Monash University Australia Monash University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Monash University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Deakin University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Deakin University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Deakin University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deakin University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Deakin University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Deakin University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Deakin University at the time of their publication.

About Deakin University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Deakin University have published 65.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.4k papers in Clinical Psychology, 334 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 3.8k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3.3k papers in General Health Professions and 1.0k papers in Health on the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1.5k papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (702 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (682 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (623 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (615 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (569 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (545 papers) and Advancements in Battery Materials (532 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (17.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (101.5k citations), Applied Psychology (22.7k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (121.7k citations) and Biomaterials (56.7k citations). Authors at Deakin University collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, BMJ Open, IEEE Access and Scientific Reports. Some of Deakin University's most productive authors include Matthew Robert Barnett, Marita P. McCabe, Michael Berk, Saeid Nahavandi, Paresh Kumar Narayan, Robert A. Cummins, Jo Salmon, Xungai Wang, David Andrew Crawford and Peter Damian Hodgson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact