Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo

7.5k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo

1.2k papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Horticulture 570
  • Forestry 221
  • Aquatic Science 389
  • Food Science 968
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 406
Replace University of Nariño with:
University of Nariño Colombia
Universidad Estatal Amazónica Ecuador
Universidad de la Amazonia Colombia
National University Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza Peru
Universidad Tecnica de Machala Ecuador
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo Ecuador
Universidad Nacional de Loja Ecuador
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí Ecuador
Universidad del Azuay Ecuador
University of Quindío Colombia
Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo relative to University of Nariño Colombia University of Nariño's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
University of Nariño · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo at the time of their publication.

About Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 70 papers in Horticulture, 257 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 72 papers in Forestry, 240 papers in Food Science and 303 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (274 papers), Plant and soil sciences (202 papers), Agricultural and Food Production Studies (113 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (96 papers), Diverse Applied Research Studies (89 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (70 papers), Education and Teacher Training (67 papers) and Business, Education, Mathematics Research (64 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (570 citations), Forestry (221 citations), Aquatic Science (389 citations), Food Science (968 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (406 citations). Authors at Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo collaborate with scholars in Ecuador, Spain and Mexico and have published in prestigious journals including Plants, Sustainability, Foods, Animals and Applied Sciences. Some of Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo's most productive authors include Juan José Reyes-Pérez, Byron Oviedo, Luis Guillermo Hernández-Montiel, Robinson J. Herrera-Feijoo, Lidia Vlassova, Jorge Gómez Gómez, Fernando Pérez-Cabello, Harry Charles Evans, Felipe Rafael Garcés Fiallos and Jaime Morante Carriel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact