The University of Texas System

3.9k papers receiving 154.8k citations

Peers

The University of Texas System
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Oncology 30.8k
  • Reproductive Medicine 7.3k
  • Cancer Research 12.3k
  • Hematology 9.0k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 3.3k
Replace Texas Children's Hospital with:
Texas Children's Hospital United States
Jacksonville College United States
Texas Oncology United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital United States
Emory University Hospital United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital United States
Memorial Medical Center United States
Loyola University Medical Center United States
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Mexico
University of Minnesota Rochester United States
The University of Texas System relative to Texas Children's Hospital United States Texas Children's Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Texas Children's Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Texas System

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Texas System. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Texas System with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Texas System more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Texas System

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Texas System at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Texas System at the time of their publication.

About The University of Texas System

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Texas System have published 4.1k papers, which have received a total of 165.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 727 papers in Oncology, 233 papers in Hematology, 278 papers in Cancer Research, 154 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 552 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (150 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (131 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (115 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (109 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (108 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (103 papers), Neutropenia and Cancer Infections (99 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (92 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oncology (30.8k citations), Reproductive Medicine (7.3k citations), Cancer Research (12.3k citations), Hematology (9.0k citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (3.3k citations). Authors at The University of Texas System collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Blood, Endocrinology and Urology. Some of The University of Texas System's most productive authors include Clifton F. Mountain, Gerald P. Bodey, Gilbert H. Fletcher, Garth L. Nicolson, John C. Porter, Rüssel J. Reiter, Harry L. Evans, James T. Willerson, Ralph A. DeFronzo and Edward T.H. Yeh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact