NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

117.1k citations
2.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

2.6k papers receiving 115.6k citations

Peers

NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 11.0k
  • Atmospheric Science 18.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 14.0k
  • Spectroscopy 15.2k
  • Catalysis 5.7k
Replace Clarendon College with:
Clarendon College United States
Clarkson College United States
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies United States
Shell (United States) United States
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory United States
Fluor (United States) United States
Emerson (United States) United States
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados Mexico
Canadian Light Source (Canada) Canada
Chevron (United States) United States
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory relative to Clarendon College United States Clarendon College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Clarendon College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 117.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 571 papers in Atmospheric Science, 324 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 451 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 139 papers in Catalysis and 570 papers in Organic Chemistry on the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (385 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (297 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (188 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (164 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (155 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (126 papers), Climate variability and models (116 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (110 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (11.0k citations), Atmospheric Science (18.8k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (14.0k citations), Spectroscopy (15.2k citations) and Catalysis (5.7k citations). Authors at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and India and have published in prestigious journals including RSC Advances, Molecular Physics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Chemical Communications and Atmospheric chemistry and physics. Some of NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory's most productive authors include Samuel Francis Boys, Fernando Bernardi, A. McLachlan, H. C. Longuet–Higgins, Leslie E. Orgel, Sheng Dai, Nicholas C. Handy, Anthony J. Stone, A. D. Buckingham and N. Sheppard.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact