Helmholtz-Institute Ulm

171.9k citations
3.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Helmholtz-Institute Ulm

3.5k papers receiving 161.1k citations

Peers

Helmholtz-Institute Ulm
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Automotive Engineering 29.6k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 86.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 20.6k
  • Catalysis 5.3k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 10.4k
Replace BASF (Germany) with:
BASF (Germany) Germany
University of Wuppertal Germany
Munich University of Applied Sciences Germany
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Hungary
Université Lille Nord de France France
Shell (Netherlands) Netherlands
Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences Germany
Université d'Évry Val-d'Essonne France
Université d'Artois France
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour France
Helmholtz-Institute Ulm relative to BASF (Germany) Germany BASF (Germany)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
BASF (Germany) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Helmholtz-Institute Ulm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Helmholtz-Institute Ulm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Helmholtz-Institute Ulm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmholtz-Institute Ulm more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Helmholtz-Institute Ulm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Helmholtz-Institute Ulm at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Helmholtz-Institute Ulm at the time of their publication.

About Helmholtz-Institute Ulm

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Helmholtz-Institute Ulm have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 171.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 564 papers in Automotive Engineering, 1.8k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 149 papers in Catalysis, 382 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 92 papers in Electrochemistry on the topics of Advancements in Battery Materials (1.3k papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (1.2k papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (548 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (358 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (349 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (185 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (167 papers) and Ionic liquids properties and applications (119 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Automotive Engineering (29.6k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (86.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (20.6k citations), Catalysis (5.3k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (10.4k citations). Authors at Helmholtz-Institute Ulm collaborate with scholars in Germany, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Power Sources, Advanced Energy Materials, ChemSusChem, Electrochimica Acta and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Some of Helmholtz-Institute Ulm's most productive authors include Stefano Passerini, L. Claes, Maximilian Fichtner, Dominic Bresser, Tamás Rőszer, Alberto Varzi, Kelly Del Tredici, Axel Groß, Daniel Buchholz and Hans‐Joachim Wilke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact