Universidad San Francisco de Quito

62.3k citations
4.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidad San Francisco de Quito

3.8k papers receiving 55.1k citations

Peers

Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Ecological Modeling 1.9k
  • Modeling and Simulation 1.8k
  • Parasitology 2.1k
  • Ecology 7.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.3k
Replace Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador with:
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Ecuador
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia
Central University of Ecuador Ecuador
Universidad de Las Américas Ecuador
Universidad del Rosario Colombia
University of Caldas Colombia
Industrial University of Santander Colombia
University of the Andes Venezuela
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral Ecuador
Universidad de Panamá Panama
Universidad San Francisco de Quito relative to Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Ecuador Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad San Francisco de Quito. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad San Francisco de Quito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad San Francisco de Quito more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad San Francisco de Quito at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad San Francisco de Quito at the time of their publication.

About Universidad San Francisco de Quito

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad San Francisco de Quito have published 4.8k papers, which have received a total of 62.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 163 papers in Ecological Modeling, 226 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 460 papers in Ecology, 351 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 154 papers in Law on the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (169 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (160 papers), Marine animal studies overview (103 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (101 papers), Plant and animal studies (80 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (74 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (73 papers) and Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (70 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.9k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.8k citations), Parasitology (2.1k citations), Ecology (7.1k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.3k citations). Authors at Universidad San Francisco de Quito collaborate with scholars in Ecuador, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, ZooKeys, PeerJ and Molecules. Some of Universidad San Francisco de Quito's most productive authors include Antonio León-Reyes, Corné M. J. Pieterse, Saskia C. M. Van Wees, Dieuwertje van der Does, Eva O. L. Lantsoght, Christos Zamioudis, Gabriel A. Trueba, Andrés Caicedo, Ernesto Contreras and Andrea C. Encalada.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact