University of Rochester Medicine

1.2M citations
29.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Rochester Medicine

25.3k papers receiving 1.0M citations

Peers

University of Rochester Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Neurology 41.4k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 88.8k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17.9k
  • Neurology 58.8k
  • Molecular Biology 261.0k
Replace University Health Network with:
University Health Network Canada
Hospital for Sick Children Canada
Veterans Health Administration United States
Thomas Jefferson University United States
SickKids Foundation Canada
United States Department of Veterans Affairs United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia United States
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital United States
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre Canada
University of Rochester Medicine relative to University Health Network Canada University Health Network's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
University Health Network · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Rochester Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Rochester Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Rochester Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Rochester Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Rochester Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Rochester Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Rochester Medicine at the time of their publication.

About University of Rochester Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Rochester Medicine have published 29.7k papers, which have received a total of 1.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.9k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 2.7k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 274 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 2.1k papers in Oncology and 1.5k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (452 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (422 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (421 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (413 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (412 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (410 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (408 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (404 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Neurology (41.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (88.8k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (17.9k citations), Neurology (58.8k citations) and Molecular Biology (261.0k citations). Authors at University of Rochester Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Neurology. Some of University of Rochester Medicine's most productive authors include Maiken Nedergaard, Berislav V. Zloković, Irfan Rahman, Ronald M. Epstein, Steven A. Goldman, David H. Mathews, Arthur J. Moss, Paul R. Duberstein, Fred Sherman and Wojciech Zaręba.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact