NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital

1.7M citations
37.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital

32.9k papers receiving 1.5M citations

Peers

NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 205.9k
  • Surgery 284.9k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 194.8k
  • Neurology 92.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80.6k
Replace Columbia University Irving Medical Center with:
Columbia University Irving Medical Center United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia United States
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School United States
Thomas Jefferson University United States
United States Department of Veterans Affairs United States
Boston Children's Hospital United States
Tufts Medical Center United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital United States
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital relative to Columbia University Irving Medical Center United States Columbia University Irving Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital at the time of their publication.

About NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital have published 37.7k papers, which have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.8k papers in Surgery, 3.9k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 4.7k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 2.0k papers in Neurology and 1.5k papers in Hematology on the topics of Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (912 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (778 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (615 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (609 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (453 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (442 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (431 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (399 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (205.9k citations), Surgery (284.9k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (194.8k citations), Neurology (92.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (80.6k citations). Authors at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Urology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Blood, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Some of NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital's most productive authors include Marshal F. Folstein, Paul R. McHugh, Susan E. Folstein, Mary E. Charlson, Carl Nathan, Craig Mackenzie, Kathy L. Aleš, Peter Pompei, CHARLES SUMNER NEER and Richard Deverux.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact