National Institute of Mental Health

118.3k citations
3.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Mental Health

2.7k papers receiving 97.7k citations

Peers

National Institute of Mental Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Clinical Psychology 27.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 3.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 23.0k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 4.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 16.2k
Replace Institute of Behavioral Sciences with:
Institute of Behavioral Sciences Japan
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Japan
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Japan
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Japan
National Institute for Physiological Sciences Japan
Fukushima Medical University Japan
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Japan
Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry Japan
Keio University Hospital Japan
International University of Health and Welfare Japan
National Institute of Mental Health relative to Institute of Behavioral Sciences Japan Institute of Behavioral Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Institute of Behavioral Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Mental Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Mental Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Mental Health at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Mental Health

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Mental Health have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 118.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 497 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 685 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 704 papers in Clinical Psychology, 70 papers in Biological Psychiatry and 363 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (212 papers), Sleep and related disorders (169 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (163 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (159 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (152 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (138 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (133 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (127 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (27.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (3.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (23.0k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (4.0k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (16.2k citations). Authors at National Institute of Mental Health collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and Czechia and have published in prestigious journals including Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Scientific Reports, Journal of Affective Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Brain and Development. Some of National Institute of Mental Health's most productive authors include Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Josef P. Rauschecker, Shelli Avenevoli, Jianping He, Daniel R. Weinberger, Masako Okawa, Steven F. Maier, Yoshiharu Kim, Martin E. P. Seligman and Marcy Burstein.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact