Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 861
- Lichen and fungal ecology 202
- Bryophyte Studies and Records 119
- Plant Science 767
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 308
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 125
- Top scholars
- R. Toby PenningtonDavid G. MannPeter M. HollingsworthJames Alexander RatterChristopher James EllisLouis P. Ronse De CraeneJames Edward RichardsonB. J. Coppins
- Journals
- Taxon (153 papers)The Lichenologist (93 papers)Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (61 papers)Phytotaxa (57 papers)Plant Systematics and Evolution (53 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
2.6k papers receiving 88.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 33.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.1k
- Ecological Modeling 1.8k
- Plant Science 20.5k
- Ecology 8.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh at the time of their publication.
About Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 88.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 767 papers in Plant Science, 174 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 33 papers in Ecological Modeling and 641 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (861 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (402 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (308 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (225 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (202 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (154 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (125 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (119 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (33.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.8k citations), Plant Science (20.5k citations) and Ecology (8.3k citations). Authors at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Taxon, The Lichenologist, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Phytotaxa and Plant Systematics and Evolution. Some of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh's most productive authors include R. Toby Pennington, David G. Mann, Peter M. Hollingsworth, James Alexander Ratter, Christopher James Ellis, Louis P. Ronse De Craene, James Edward Richardson, B. J. Coppins, Quentin Cronk and Roy Watling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.