Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Software top 5%
Papers in
-
- Formal Methods in Verification 369
- Top scholars
- Jiřı́ FrimlCarl‐Philipp HeisenbergKrishnendu ChatterjeeLeonid A. SazanovChristoph H. LampertNick BartonThomas A. HenzingerPeter M. Jonas
- Journals
- Nature Communications (132 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (102 papers)ACM Transactions on Graphics (63 papers)Physical review. B. (54 papers)eLife (54 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
3.8k papers receiving 113.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
- Cell Biology 10.7k
- Software 2.6k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 9.3k
- Molecular Biology 33.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 8.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Science and Technology Austria
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Science and Technology Austria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Science and Technology Austria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Science and Technology Austria more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Science and Technology Austria
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Science and Technology Austria at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Science and Technology Austria at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Science and Technology Austria
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Science and Technology Austria have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 118.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 756 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 158 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 147 papers in Software, 271 papers in Mathematical Physics and 89 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics on the topics of Formal Methods in Verification (369 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (256 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (197 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (196 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (156 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (144 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (138 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (137 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cell Biology (10.7k citations), Software (2.6k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (9.3k citations), Molecular Biology (33.1k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (8.4k citations). Authors at Institute of Science and Technology Austria collaborate with scholars in Austria, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Communications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Physical review. B. and eLife. Some of Institute of Science and Technology Austria's most productive authors include Jiřı́ Friml, Carl‐Philipp Heisenberg, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Leonid A. Sazanov, Christoph H. Lampert, Nick Barton, Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter M. Jonas, Michael Sixt and Maksym Serbyn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.