United Network for Organ Sharing

39.2k citations
634 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United Network for Organ Sharing

562 papers receiving 33.3k citations

Peers

United Network for Organ Sharing
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Transplantation 11.3k
  • Hepatology 7.8k
  • Surgery 17.6k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8.2k
  • Nephrology 1.3k
Replace The Rogosin Institute with:
The Rogosin Institute United States
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health United States
National Kidney Foundation United States
Digestive Care (United States) United States
Toronto General Hospital Research Institute Canada
MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute United States
Children's Hospital of Western Ontario Canada
UPMC Central Pa United States
Methodist University Hospital United States
American College of Cardiology United States
United Network for Organ Sharing relative to The Rogosin Institute United States The Rogosin Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19.1×
The Rogosin Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United Network for Organ Sharing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Network for Organ Sharing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Network for Organ Sharing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Network for Organ Sharing more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United Network for Organ Sharing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Network for Organ Sharing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Network for Organ Sharing at the time of their publication.

About United Network for Organ Sharing

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Network for Organ Sharing have published 634 papers, which have received a total of 39.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 271 papers in Transplantation, 92 papers in Hepatology, 374 papers in Surgery, 213 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 64 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (271 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (242 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (201 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (148 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (87 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (35 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (34 papers) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Transplantation (11.3k citations), Hepatology (7.8k citations), Surgery (17.6k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (8.2k citations) and Nephrology (1.3k citations). Authors at United Network for Organ Sharing collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Transplantation, Transplantation, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Liver Transplantation and Clinical Transplantation. Some of United Network for Organ Sharing's most productive authors include Jon J. Snyder, Ajay K. Israni, Maureen McBride, M.A. Skeans, Jodi M. Smith, Wida S. Cherikh, H. Myron Kauffman, B.L. Kasiske, Jennifer L. Wainright and Richard B. Freeman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact