University of the Sciences

5.8k papers receiving 182.6k citations

Peers

University of the Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Family Practice 1.5k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 2.5k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 3.3k
  • Molecular Biology 34.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 8.9k
Replace St. John's University with:
St. John's University United States
University of Baltimore United States
Howard University United States
University of Rhode Island United States
Providence College United States
Triangle United States
United States Military Academy United States
Hartford Financial Services (United States) United States
Philadelphia University United States
Long Island University United States
University of the Sciences relative to St. John's University United States St. John's University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
St. John's University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of the Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of the Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of the Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of the Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of the Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of the Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of the Sciences at the time of their publication.

About University of the Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of the Sciences have published 6.5k papers, which have received a total of 197.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 109 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 155 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 35 papers in Family Practice, 154 papers in Pharmacology and 885 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (109 papers), Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (108 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (106 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (102 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (91 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (77 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (71 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (70 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (1.5k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (2.5k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (3.3k citations), Molecular Biology (34.0k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (8.9k citations). Authors at University of the Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, Pakistan and China and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Pharmacotherapy, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. Some of University of the Sciences's most productive authors include Robert E. Ricklefs, S. Shtrikman, Zvi Hashin, Joseph R. Ecker, Richard M. Schultz, Susan Wainwright, Noreen Sher Akbar, V. Vítek, Joshua B. Plotkin and Grzegorz Kudla.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact