UL Research Institutes

6.2k citations
315 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

UL Research Institutes

279 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

UL Research Institutes
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Occupational Therapy 583
  • Automotive Engineering 1.3k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 948
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 530
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.1k
Replace Owens Corning (United States) with:
Owens Corning (United States) United States
RJ Lee Group (United States) United States
S&C Electric Company (United States) United States
Kimberly-Clark (Canada) Canada
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission United States
Metro Transit United States
Applied Technical Services (United States) United States
INC Research (United States) United States
Globe University United States
St Louis Community College United States
UL Research Institutes relative to Owens Corning (United States) United States Owens Corning (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.1×
Owens Corning (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at UL Research Institutes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at UL Research Institutes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at UL Research Institutes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UL Research Institutes more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at UL Research Institutes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with UL Research Institutes at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with UL Research Institutes at the time of their publication.

About UL Research Institutes

In recent decades, authors affiliated with UL Research Institutes have published 315 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 65 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 23 papers in Occupational Therapy, 31 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 38 papers in Automotive Engineering and 38 papers in Environmental Engineering on the topics of Fire dynamics and safety research (44 papers), Electrical Fault Detection and Protection (38 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (31 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (31 papers), Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques (29 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (23 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (20 papers) and Advancements in Battery Materials (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy (583 citations), Automotive Engineering (1.3k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (948 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (530 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2.1k citations). Authors at UL Research Institutes collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Fire Technology, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine and Fire Safety Journal. Some of UL Research Institutes's most productive authors include Judith A. Jeevarajan, Stephen Kerber, Partha P. Mukherjee, Marilyn Black, Daniel Juarez Robles, Markus Zahn, Alexander Mamishev, Yanqing Du, Fumin Yang and Kishore Sundara-Rajan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact