Universidad Internacional del Ecuador
Impact in
-
- Parasites and Host Interactions
- Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
Papers in
-
- E-Learning and Knowledge Management 39
-
- Educational and Organizational Development 53
- Top scholars
- William Eduardo Villegas-ChXavier Palacios-PachecoPhilip J. CooperJulien BogousslavskyMilton Román CañizaresSergio Luján‐MoraSantiago Sánchez-ViteriFernando Abad‐Franch
- Journals
- IEEE Access (26 papers)PLoS ONE (14 papers)Sustainability (9 papers)BMJ Open (9 papers)PLoS neglected tropical diseases (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- EcuadorSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Universidad Internacional del Ecuador
861 papers receiving 7.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
- Parasitology 759
- Computer Science Applications 356
- Small Animals 236
- Epidemiology 1.0k
- Insect Science 358
Countries citing scholars working at Universidad Internacional del Ecuador
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad Internacional del Ecuador with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad Internacional del Ecuador more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad Internacional del Ecuador
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad Internacional del Ecuador at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad Internacional del Ecuador at the time of their publication.
About Universidad Internacional del Ecuador
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad Internacional del Ecuador have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 54 papers in Computer Science Applications, 87 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 200 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 25 papers in Occupational Therapy and 32 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (177 papers), Diverse Applied Research Studies (75 papers), Educational and Organizational Development (53 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (43 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (39 papers), Education and Teacher Training (33 papers), Social Issues and Policies in Latin America (31 papers) and Business, Education, Mathematics Research (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Parasitology (759 citations), Computer Science Applications (356 citations), Small Animals (236 citations), Epidemiology (1.0k citations) and Insect Science (358 citations). Authors at Universidad Internacional del Ecuador collaborate with scholars in Ecuador, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Access, PLoS ONE, Sustainability, BMJ Open and PLoS neglected tropical diseases. Some of Universidad Internacional del Ecuador's most productive authors include William Eduardo Villegas-Ch, Xavier Palacios-Pacheco, Philip J. Cooper, Julien Bogousslavsky, Milton Román Cañizares, Sergio Luján‐Mora, Santiago Sánchez-Viteri, Fernando Abad‐Franch, Joselin García-Ortiz and Martha E. Chico.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.