Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography

9.9k citations
311 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques 52
    • Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies 18

Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography

297 papers receiving 9.9k citations

Peers

Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Radiation 775
  • Environmental Engineering 949
  • Ocean Engineering 758
  • Earth-Surface Processes 353
  • Urology 275
Replace RMS Foundation with:
RMS Foundation Switzerland
EMI (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
BP (Germany) Germany
Environmental Protection Agency Denmark
English Heritage United Kingdom
ENEA Bologna Research Centre
Laboratoire de Mécanique et Matériaux du Génie Civil France
Geological Survey of Belgium Belgium
Azienda Regionale per la protezione dell'ambiente Lombardia Italy
Jacobs (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography relative to RMS Foundation Switzerland RMS Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33.0×
RMS Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography at the time of their publication.

About Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography have published 311 papers, which have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Radiation, 18 papers in Urology, 16 papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 22 papers in Ocean Engineering and 19 papers in Environmental Engineering on the topics of Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (52 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (22 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (20 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (18 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (14 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (13 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (12 papers) and Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiation (775 citations), Environmental Engineering (949 citations), Ocean Engineering (758 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (353 citations) and Urology (275 citations). Authors at Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography collaborate with scholars in Belgium, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Anatomy, Scientific Reports, Water Resources Research, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of Morphology. Some of Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography's most productive authors include Luc Van Hoorebeke, Veerle Cnudde, Denis Van Loo, Matthieu Boone, Thomas De Schryver, Tom Bultreys, Peter Dubruel, Maria Cornelissen, Elien Gevaert and Thomas Billiet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact