Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

269.4k citations
24.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

19.9k papers receiving 247.0k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.3k
  • Forestry 3.3k
  • Ecology 19.1k
  • Pollution 7.7k
  • Horticulture 624
Replace Universidade Federal Fluminense with:
Universidade Federal Fluminense Brazil
Universidade Federal da Bahia Brazil
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Brazil
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Brazil
Universidade Federal de Viçosa Brazil
Universidade de Brasília Brazil
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Brazil
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo relative to Universidade Federal Fluminense Brazil Universidade Federal Fluminense's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Universidade Federal Fluminense · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo have published 24.5k papers, which have received a total of 269.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 641 papers in Forestry, 648 papers in Information Systems and Management, 913 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 706 papers in Soil Science and 271 papers in Occupational Therapy on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (758 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (757 papers), Business and Management Studies (592 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (565 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (512 papers), Plant and animal studies (498 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (497 papers) and Education and Digital Technologies (459 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.3k citations), Forestry (3.3k citations), Ecology (19.1k citations), Pollution (7.7k citations) and Horticulture (624 citations). Authors at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Zootaxa, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Revista Árvore and Floresta e Ambiente. Some of Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo's most productive authors include Giancarlo Guizzardi, Renato Antonio Krohling, Anselmo Frizera, Arnaldo Leal‐Junior, Carlos Marques, José Geraldo Mill, Francisco Elias Jorge, J. C. Fabris, Mário Sarcinelli-Filho and André R. S. Amaral.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact