Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso

159.5k citations
16.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso

14.1k papers receiving 159.4k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.9k
  • Parasitology 4k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 5.3k
  • Ecology 10.9k
  • Paleontology 4.3k
Replace Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul with:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil
Universidade Federal de Goiás Brazil
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Brazil
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil
Universidade Federal do Tocantins Brazil
Universidade Federal de Lavras Brazil
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso relative to Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso have published 16.4k papers, which have received a total of 159.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 226 papers in Forestry, 635 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 630 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 310 papers in Parasitology and 389 papers in Animal Science and Zoology on the topics of Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (421 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (244 papers), Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (221 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (216 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (199 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (195 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (192 papers) and Wood Treatment and Properties (181 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.9k citations), Parasitology (4k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (5.3k citations), Ecology (10.9k citations) and Paleontology (4.3k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, PLoS ONE, Cadernos de Saúde Pública and Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Some of Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso's most productive authors include Marcos Roberto de Oliveira, Fernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐Mello, José Eduardo de Aguilar‐Nascimento, Wolfgang Johannes Junk, Cor Jésus Fernandes Fontes, Cátia Nunes da Cunha, Domingos Tabajara de Oliveira Martins, Ricardo Stefani, Francisco José Dutra Souto and Eduardo Guimarães Couto.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact