Universidad de Flores

276 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Universidad de Flores
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 368
  • Pollution 106
  • Waste Management and Disposal 56
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 76
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 75
Replace Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción with:
Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción Paraguay
Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha Brazil
UniGuairacá Centro Universitário Brazil
Ministerio de Defensa Argentina
Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación Argentina
University of Mendoza Argentina
Centro Universitário de Lavras Brazil
Faculdades Integradas de Taquara Brazil
Centro Universitário FIEO Brazil
Universidad del Mar Chile
Universidad de Flores relative to Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción Paraguay Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.8×
Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad de Flores

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad de Flores. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad de Flores with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad de Flores more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad de Flores

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad de Flores at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad de Flores at the time of their publication.

About Universidad de Flores

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad de Flores have published 358 papers, which have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 57 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 1 paper in Horticulture and 32 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Sports Performance and Training (38 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (22 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (16 papers), Heavy metals in environment (11 papers), Linguistics and Education Research (10 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (9 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (368 citations), Pollution (106 citations), Waste Management and Disposal (56 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (76 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (75 citations). Authors at Universidad de Flores collaborate with scholars in Argentina, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Journal of Human Kinetics, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Applied Sciences and Strength and conditioning journal. Some of Universidad de Flores's most productive authors include Ana María Faggi, Estela Inés Moyano, Santiago Zabaloy, Irineu Loturco, Rubén Barakat, Tomás T. Freitas, Marı́a Perales, Fernando Pareja‐Blanco, Ignacio Refoyo and Javier Coterón López.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact