Universidade Estadual do Ceará

8.4k papers receiving 90.2k citations

Peers

Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Reproductive Medicine 5.9k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 14.8k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 537
  • Food Science 8.7k
  • Small Animals 2.4k
Replace Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte with:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
Universidade Federal do Piauí Brazil
Universidade de Fortaleza Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal do Maranhão Brazil
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alagoas Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Ceará relative to Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Estadual do Ceará

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Estadual do Ceará. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Estadual do Ceará with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Estadual do Ceará more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Estadual do Ceará

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Estadual do Ceará

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará have published 11.0k papers, which have received a total of 99.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 104 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 1.4k papers in General Health Professions, 435 papers in Information Systems and Management, 224 papers in Occupational Therapy and 1.7k papers in Education on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (874 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (650 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (543 papers), Science and Education Research (516 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (445 papers), Business and Management Studies (407 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (401 papers) and Education and Digital Technologies (383 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (5.9k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (14.8k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (537 citations), Food Science (8.7k citations) and Small Animals (2.4k citations). Authors at Universidade Estadual do Ceará collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Theriogenology, Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, Reproduction in Domestic Animals and Small Ruminant Research. Some of Universidade Estadual do Ceará's most productive authors include J.R. Figueiredo, Selene Maia de Morais, Henriette Monteiro Cordeiro de Azeredo, José Henrique Leal‐Cardoso, Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha, Maria Sálete Bessa Jorge, José Júlio Costa Sidrim, Stefan Krauter, Paulo César de Almeida and Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact