Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Impact in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Selene Maia de MoraisJ.R. FigueiredoJosé Henrique Leal‐CardosoMarcos Fábio Gadelha RochaJosé Júlio Costa SidrimMaria Sálete Bessa JorgeStefan KrauterTHEREZA MARIA MAGALHÃES MOREIRA
- Journals
- Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (99 papers)Theriogenology (89 papers)Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (59 papers)Reproduction in Domestic Animals (56 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (52 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
9.2k papers receiving 96.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 11.6k
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 707
- Food Science 6.1k
- Small Animals 2.4k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 2.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Estadual do Ceará
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Estadual do Ceará. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Estadual do Ceará with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Estadual do Ceará more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Estadual do Ceará
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará at the time of their publication.
About Universidade Estadual do Ceará
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Estadual do Ceará have published 11.4k papers, which have received a total of 96.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 152 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 88 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 882 papers in General Health Professions, 135 papers in Research and Theory and 1.2k papers in Education on the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (447 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (340 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (291 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (238 papers), Health Education and Validation (224 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (221 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (194 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (145 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (11.6k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (707 citations), Food Science (6.1k citations), Small Animals (2.4k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (2.9k citations). Authors at Universidade Estadual do Ceará collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Theriogenology, Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, Reproduction in Domestic Animals and Animal Reproduction Science. Some of Universidade Estadual do Ceará's most productive authors include Selene Maia de Morais, J.R. Figueiredo, José Henrique Leal‐Cardoso, Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha, José Júlio Costa Sidrim, Maria Sálete Bessa Jorge, Stefan Krauter, THEREZA MARIA MAGALHÃES MOREIRA, Paulo César de Almeida and Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.