The University of Dodoma

2.6k papers receiving 27.6k citations

Peers

The University of Dodoma
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 283
  • Water Science and Technology 1.4k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 984
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 660
  • Pollution 818
Replace Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology with:
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology Kenya
Kenyatta University Kenya
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology Tanzania
Moi University Kenya
University of Rwanda Rwanda
Maseno University Kenya
Mbarara University of Science and Technology Uganda
Ifakara Health Institute Tanzania
Ministry of Health Uganda
University of Malawi Malawi
The University of Dodoma relative to Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology Kenya Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Dodoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Dodoma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Dodoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Dodoma more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Dodoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Dodoma at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Dodoma at the time of their publication.

About The University of Dodoma

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Dodoma have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 27.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 80 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 20 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 114 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (78 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (76 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (66 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (50 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (50 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (50 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (49 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (283 citations), Water Science and Technology (1.4k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (984 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (660 citations) and Pollution (818 citations). Authors at The University of Dodoma collaborate with scholars in Tanzania, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Heliyon, BMC Public Health, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and Scientific Reports. Some of The University of Dodoma's most productive authors include Ismail Juma Ismail, David Amani, Gadde Srinivasa Rao, Stephen M. Kibusi, Bonaventura C. T. Mpondo, Bijjula Prabhakar Reddy, Emmanuel Joseph Rupia, Andrea C. Alfaro, Ronald Lulijwa and Jefta M. Sunzu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact