UCSI University

101.7k citations
6.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

UCSI University

5.3k papers receiving 101.7k citations

Peers

UCSI University
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Information Systems and Management 7.8k
  • Marketing 5.6k
  • Food Science 5.5k
  • Drug Discovery 80
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 3.2k
Replace International Islamic University Malaysia with:
International Islamic University Malaysia Malaysia
Taylor's University Malaysia
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Malaysia
Universiti Teknologi MARA System Malaysia
Sunway University Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah Malaysia
Monash University Malaysia Malaysia
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Malaysia
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia Malaysia
UCSI University relative to International Islamic University Malaysia Malaysia International Islamic University Malaysia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
International Islamic University Malaysia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at UCSI University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at UCSI University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at UCSI University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UCSI University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at UCSI University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with UCSI University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with UCSI University at the time of their publication.

About UCSI University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with UCSI University have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 101.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 252 papers in Information Systems and Management, 230 papers in Marketing, 35 papers in Filtration and Separation, 248 papers in Food Science and 90 papers in Pharmaceutical Science on the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (237 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (112 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (108 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (76 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (72 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (67 papers), Medicinal Plant Research (65 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (63 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (7.8k citations), Marketing (5.6k citations), Food Science (5.5k citations), Drug Discovery (80 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (3.2k citations). Authors at UCSI University collaborate with scholars in Malaysia, China and India and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, IEEE Access, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Sustainability. Some of UCSI University's most productive authors include Keng‐Boon Ooi, Garry Wei-Han Tan, Voon‐Hsien Lee, Kar Lin Nyam, Jun-Jie Hew, Lai-Ying Leong, Eugene Cheng‐Xi Aw, Hiram Ting, Jun‐Hwa Cheah and Tat‐Huei Cham.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact