University of Lancashire

336.7k citations
13.2k papers ·

Impact in

    • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Papers in

University of Lancashire

11.4k papers receiving 298.2k citations

Peers

University of Lancashire
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Instrumentation 8.9k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 29.1k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 12.0k
  • Health 11.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 27.2k
Replace Keele University with:
Keele University United Kingdom
University of Hull United Kingdom
University of Portsmouth United Kingdom
Liverpool John Moores University United Kingdom
Lancaster University United Kingdom
University of Kent United Kingdom
University of Hertfordshire United Kingdom
Northumbria University United Kingdom
Science Oxford United Kingdom
University College Cork Ireland
University of Lancashire relative to Keele University United Kingdom Keele University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Keele University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Lancashire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Lancashire. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Lancashire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Lancashire more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Lancashire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Lancashire at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Lancashire at the time of their publication.

About University of Lancashire

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Lancashire have published 13.2k papers, which have received a total of 336.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 274 papers in Instrumentation, 564 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 993 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.1k papers in Clinical Psychology and 378 papers in Health on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (611 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (449 papers), Sports Performance and Training (386 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (306 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (301 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (271 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (256 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (251 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (8.9k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (29.1k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (12.0k citations), Health (11.0k citations) and Clinical Psychology (27.2k citations). Authors at University of Lancashire collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PLoS ONE. Some of University of Lancashire's most productive authors include John E. Archer, Richard Sharpley, Soo M. Downe, MARK S. WAINWRIGHT, Dave J. Collins, Philip R. Stone, Pamela Qualter, Terence Richard Hull, Janet C. Read and Mark Dooris.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact