Universidad de Buenos Aires

59.3k papers receiving 1.3M citations

Peers

Universidad de Buenos Aires
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Plant Science 165.2k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 23.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 81.9k
  • Paleontology 28.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 46.3k
Replace Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas with:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Argentina
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Argentina
Universidad de la República de Uruguay Uruguay
Universidad Nacional de La Plata Argentina
University of Chile Chile
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Chile
Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil
Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan Argentina
University of Concepción Chile
Universidad de Buenos Aires relative to Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad de Buenos Aires

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad de Buenos Aires. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad de Buenos Aires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad de Buenos Aires more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad de Buenos Aires

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad de Buenos Aires at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad de Buenos Aires at the time of their publication.

About Universidad de Buenos Aires

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad de Buenos Aires have published 68.6k papers, which have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.9k papers in Cultural Studies, 1.6k papers in Paleontology, 594 papers in General Social Sciences, 1.8k papers in Anthropology and 3.2k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Latin American socio-political dynamics (1.2k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.1k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.1k papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (946 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (896 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (857 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (840 papers) and Argentine historical studies (812 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (165.2k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (23.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (81.9k citations), Paleontology (28.0k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (46.3k citations). Authors at Universidad de Buenos Aires collaborate with scholars in Argentina, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Scientific Reports, Carbohydrate Research and Field Crops Research. Some of Universidad de Buenos Aires's most productive authors include Osvaldo E. Sala, José M. Paruelo, Jorge J. Casal, Víctor A. Ramos, César G. Fraga, Gabriel A. Rabinovich, Carlos L. Ballaré, Gustavo A. Slafer, Jorge H. Medina and Patricia I. Oteiza.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact